DSW Working Together for Decent Work in East Africa (Fit for Life) Project End-Term Evaluation-Job Vacancy June 2014

 

Deutsche Stiftung Weltbevoelkerung (DSW)

Terms of Reference for End-Term Evaluation for a Project Titled “Working Together for Decent Work in East Africa (Fit for Life)”

Terms of Reference for End-Term Evaluation

Introduction

1. Focus of the Final Evaluation

The End-Term evaluation of “Working Together for Decent Work Project” is to assess the overall performance and achievement of the key expected results during the implementation period of the project. 
Emphasis will be placed on the relevance of the objectives and activities to the identified needs, the efficiency of its implementation and its effectiveness to completion. 
The evaluation will also include an assessment on how the project incorporated the Mid-term recommendations and incorporation of sustainability measures and the identification of lessons learnt and emerging issues for further programme development by DSW.

2. Background of “Working Together for Decent Work in East Africa (Fit for Life)” Project”

The Working Together for Decent Work project is an EU funded initiative working in Kenya, Tanzania and Ethiopia. 

In all these three countries, employment in the informal economy provides income and livelihood for the majority of the working population.  In Tanzania, for example, research indicates that this is the case for as much as 90% of the working population {National Social Security Policy. United Republic of Tanzania, Ministry of Labour, Youth Development and Sports, 2003}.
In Kenya, the estimate from the National Bureau of Statistics is 70% and the informal economy creates two-thirds of the annual new employment opportunities. Ethiopia’s Labour Force Survey (2004-2005) shows that more than half of urban employment opportunities are in the informal sector. 

Young people, who make up a growing proportion of the population in all three countries, face increasing difficulties in entering the labour force, with fewer opportunities in the formal sector forcing them to enter into informal employment.  
In East Africa, women and youth make up a disproportionate share of the informal sector workforce. Women’s participation in the formal economy is limited by cultural norms, limited opportunities for education, early marriage, and domestic responsibilities, among other factors. 
As a result, a higher percentage of women than men work in the informal economy, and women are concentrated in the lower-income segments. 
In all three countries, social protection measures have traditionally taken the form of temporary emergency support rather than institutionalized, permanent mechanisms which leave informal sector workers more vulnerable to life’s shocks.

Though the importance and growing size of the informal sector in the three target countries has been widely recognized, critical problems still remain:

  1. Workers in the informal economy, particularly youth and women, are poorly equipped to cope with poverty, poverty, powerlessness, and exclusion.
  2. The needs of those working in the informal economy are not adequately understood or addressed.
  3. Learning and sharing from best practices at the community level is limited. 
DSW is committed towards sustainable development of the world population by facilitating the implementation of projects and programmes at community level in partnership with NGOs and Community Based Institutions. 
The Working Together for Decent Work in East Africa is a 3-year project supporting social protection and employment for those excluded from the formal labor market, especially women and youth. 
The has been implemented by DSW in partnership with the Legal and Human Rights Centre (LHRC) in Tanzania, the Professional Alliance for Development in Ethiopia (PADET), and the National Gender and Equality Commission (NGEC) in Kenya.  
The key outcomes of this project and indeed relevant to this consultancy work are:
  • Result 1: Women and youth in the target areas are empowered with the knowledge and skills to improve their socio-economic and health situation.
  • Result 2: Increased engagement between stakeholder groups leading to more responsive and appropriate policies.
  • Result 3: Best practices, innovations and successes are widely disseminated and replicated, leading to more effective programmes and initiatives
3. Scope of the Evaluation
This evaluation is going to be limited only to the project as implemented by DSW and its partners outlined above thus far. 
The scope of the evaluation will be advised primarily by the International Programme Coordinator in close collaboration with DSW Country Office staff with significant contribution by partner staff. 
The scope of the work shall be limited to the objectives of this TOR.

3.1. Objectives of the Evaluation

The evaluation should;
  • Assess the relevance the project expected results and activities to the identified needs of the target group.
  • Assess the programme performance and extent to which the objectives and outcomes have been met.
  • Examine the efficiency of implementation of the action.
  • Assess the effectiveness of the approaches employed in the implementation of the action.
  • Examine the achievements and constraints experienced during the implementation of this project since its inception in 2011.
  • Assess the quality of cooperation with project partners, institutions and effectiveness of coordination mechanisms with respect to contribution, timely decision making and problem solving.
  • Examine and assess EU visibility during implementation of the action.
  • Provide guidance on the potential and requirements for sustainability of the project results.
  • Identify lessons learnt for documentation and recommendations for future DSW programme development work.
  • Assess the effectiveness of the programme advocacy strategy to influence policy changes and policy reviews.
Some of the key questions to be addressed in order to achieve objectives include but not limited to;
  • What outcomes (intended and unintended) have been achieved.
  • Have the results been achieved in a cost effective and efficient way.
  • Have policy reviews or changes occurred and to which outcomes have contributed to.
  • To what extent the target beneficiaries been involved in the programme implementation.
  • Which exit strategies that have been put in place to ensure programme sustainability.
  • How have the programme objectives contributed to DSW strategic objectives.
3.2. Guiding Principles for the End- Term Evaluation

The End- Term Evaluation should assess the “Working Together for Decent Work Project” Project for its relevance, the efficiency of its implementation, its effectiveness, impact and the sustainability of its outputs.

  • Relevance: The extent to which the program conforms to the needs and priorities of the target groups and the policies and plans of the recipient regions and districts.
  • Efficiency: The extent to which the costs of the program can be justified by its results i.e. if the program has been managed with reasonable regard for efficiency.
  • Effectiveness: The extent to which the program is achieving its objectives, taking their relative importance into account.
  • Impact of the project: Assess the extent to which the project is contributing to the realization of the objectives. Both positive and negative impacts of the project should be assessed.
  • Sustainability: The continuation or longevity of benefits from the program after the cessation of the EC funding.
4. The Proposed Evaluation Process

The following process will be followed;

a) A desk-review of relevant project documents, including project proposal, log frame and other relevant documents, a range of which will be agreed upon and made available prior to the implementation of the survey.
b) An inception report, detailing the survey design, methodology, indicators, tools, work plan schedule and budget to carry out the assignment in each country will be written. This will be done in consultation with DSW International Programme Coordinator, DSW Country Offices and project partners.
c) Data and relevant information will be collected data through field work in Kenya, Tanzania and Ethiopia. Data will be analysed findings interpreted based on this give recommendations.
d) Following completion of the data collection, the Consultant will make a presentation to DSW staff 
on the provisional findings and likely recommendations.
e) Further to this, the Consultant will present a draft report for inputs by DSW, partners and stakeholders as appropriate.The report will include three country level reports, which will feed into a regional level report. The report shall be comprehensive and provide detailed specific findings and providing key recommendations on way forward.
f) The Consultant will then finalize the report and resubmit the Final Report to DSW Regional Office in Nairobi, Kenya in six hard copies and six soft copies in a compact disk. DSW shall have sole ownership of all final data and any findings shall only be shared or reproduced with the permission of DSW.

5. Products Expected from the End- Term Evaluation

  • Inception report – give more explanations and relate it to key issues targeted by the End-Term evaluation with clear recommendations on corrective action and areas of replication.
  • Summary of field visit reports
  • Draft final report – submitted for review accompanied by a debriefing of the key findings with DSW Regional Office.  
  • Final report – compiled based on the feedback gathered and submitted to the DSW Regional Office.
6. Methodology
It is anticipated that the Consultant will interact with project personnel and beneficiaries and collect data and information for the evaluation through various methods relevant to the exercise. 
The Consultant will need to be cognizant of furthering data collection techniques utilized during the project baseline to ensure consistency of the evaluation approach. 
The Consultant should provide every possible opportunity for project stakeholders and beneficiaries to participate in and contribute to the end-term evaluation. 
In particular the Consultant will be expected to:

a) Study the key project documents including proposal and logframe.

b) Study the project summary and interim technical reports for year 1 and year 2.

c) Study project baseline, mid-term, key events, workshop, training and accreditation reports.

d) Make reference to the EU strategies under which this project has been financed.

In carrying out the evaluation, the Consultant should ensure independence and impartiality to ensure objectivity of the evaluation.

7. Qualifications and Experience

The Consultant must have post-graduate qualification in relevant field (social /health sciences, business, economics and gender issues) with good specialization in Sexual Reproductive Health or Microenterprise. 
The Consultant should have demonstrated knowledge and experience in monitoring and evaluating health/development projects regionally.
Specifically, the Consultant (s) selected must have the following qualifications to be considered:
  • At least 8 years research experience in Business, Economics, and gender issues in a development setting (evidence may be required);
  • A Masters’ degree in any of the above relevant fields would be an added advantage; 
  • Experience in undertaking research in the informal sector i.e. the regulatory framework, and participation by women and youth (evidence will be required);
  • Experience working on a regional level with particular focus in the 3 program target countries.
  • A demonstrated high level of professionalism, and an ability to work independently and work within the limits of given deadlines. 
  • Excellent analytical, writing, and presentation skills.
  • High proficiency in written and spoken English is required.
Specific experience in evaluating EU projects will be an asset. 0708565929

8. Work Plan and Submission

The End-Term evaluation will commence no later than June 2014.

Your application should include the following:

  • A detailed resume highlighting the work that the Consultant has undertaken, which is relevant to this assignment;
  • Minimum of three (3) samples of reports developed by the Consultant addressing similar issues;
  • A detailed work plan and timeframe which must be costed (in the local currency) at each stage;
  • A brief outline of the methodology the Consultant will use to guide the process; explaining in detail the methodology and tools to be used in carrying out the assignment.
  • A proposed outline for the report.
  • Interpretation of the TOR
All interested Consultants are requested to send their applications via email so as to be received by 13th June 2014 with the subject title: ‘Consultancy: Project End – Term Evaluation-’ with an accompanying cover letter. 
Applications should be sent to vacancies@dswkenya.org or in hard copy to;

The International Programme Coordinator
Working Together for Decent Work Project
DSW (Deutsche Stiftung Weltbevoelkerung)
Hatheru Road, Hatheru Court (Lavington)
P.O Box 2438 – 00202
Nairobi, Kenya



If you would like to Get email updates of a new Job Vacancies,Enter your email address down here :

Note: Activation required. After subscribing, please go to your inbox and click on activation link